CATL

Battery Serial Number Battery Chemistry Material Flow Aggregation
001PBXXX00000BE5J020 LFP individual battery
Battery Model Battery Cell Type Tracing Period Start
CATL-Shenxing prismatic 07 Mar 2023
Battery Status # of Cells per Battery Tracing Period End
Original 126 11 Apr 2024
Manufacturing Date Weight Data Collection Assured By
May 2024 564 kg CATL
EV OEM Total Energy  
not applicable 84,00 kWh  
Country of EV Production Energy Density Traceability
not applicable 148,94 Wh/kg (2/3) med
Battery Producer Rated Capacity Interoperability
CATL 204 Ah (1/3) basic
Country of Battery Production Expected Lifetime DAT Verification Assured By
China China  not disclosed TUV Rheinland
Botree Recycling
Battery Cell Producer Voltage
(Min - Nominal - Max)		  
CATL 252V - 406V - 479V  
Country of Cell Production Temperature Range Verification
China China -30C° - 60C° (2/3) med
 
Comments & Disclaimers

1) Technical parameters do not reflect the major focus of the GBA BP MVP pilots
2) Definitions of traceability, interoperability and verification can be found on the landing page
3) The tracing period data were mainly used for simplified mass balancing to determine suppliers proportions
4) Battery number is limited to 20 symbols only

(*) 184 kg refer to the weight of lithium carbonate
Bill of Materials Materials Tracebility Hazardous Components
5 raw materials 48,00%  
Recycled Materials Materials Traceability (In Pilot)  
0,00% 48,00%  
Primary Traced Material
Physical Amount Traced Amount
 
Lithium
184,00 kg* 184,00 kg
 
Share Company
Country ESG Performance
100%  
not disclosed
Chile Chile reported
     
     
 
   
  0%  
not traced
   
Secondary Traced Material
Physical Amount Traced Amount
 
Graphite
89,00 kg 89,00 kg
 
Share Company
Country ESG Performance
  70%  
not disclosed
China China reported
  30%  
not disclosed
China China reported
     
 
   
  0%  
not traced
   
 
Comments & Disclaimers

GBA members and partners
1) As per the conditions of the pilots the value of the physical weight and supply shares could have been smoothed or rounded
2) Materials tracking or tracing did not automatically mean sharing of ESG data
3) The requirements to hazardous components are not yet fully defined

 

 

Clusters
mining refining materials cell battery overall
# of companies
2 1 3 1 1 8
Quantitative Issue:
  (01) Greenhouse Gas
# of reports
1 1 2 1 1 6
GHG (PMA)
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld
primary data share
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld
GHG (HMA)
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld 49
primary data share
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld
Qualitative Issues
# of reports
2 1 3 1 1 8
ESG Score
0,83 0,84 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,91
n/a rate (%)
13% 8% 10% 6% 6% 10%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
17% 30% 2% 5% 5% 9%
(B) standard
5% 5% 9% 0% 0% 0%
(C) self-reported
78% 65% 88% 0% 0% 58%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 95% 95% 27%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 1 1 2
# of reports
2 1 3 1 1 8
ESG Score
0,85 0,88 0,84 0,98 0,98 0,91
n/a rate (%)
0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 1%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
0% 0% 3% 3% 3% 2%
(B) standard
44% 46% 28% 0% 0% 26%
(C) self-reported
56% 54% 69% 0% 0% 44%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 97% 97% 28%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 1 1 2
# of reports
2 1 3 1 1 8
ESG Score
withheld withheld withheld 0,95 0,95 withheld
n/a rate (%)
51% 16% 49% 4% 4% 34%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
44% 58% 2% 7% 7% 15%
(B) standard
0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 7%
(C) self-reported
56% 42% 78% 0% 0% 38%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 93% 93% 40%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 1 1 2
# of reports
      1   1
ESG Score
      0,94   0,94
n/a rate (%)
      0%   0%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
      0%   0%
(B) standard
      0%   0%
(C) self-reported
      0%   0%
(D) validated
      100%   100%
# of verified reports
      1   1
# of reports
2 1 3 1 1 8
ESG Score
0,92 1,00 0,90 0,97 0,97 0,95
n/a rate (%)
2% 0% 4% 1% 1% 2%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
7% 12% 0% 0% 0% 3%
(B) standard
28% 25% 24% 0% 0% 19%
(C) self-reported
65% 64% 76% 0% 0% 52%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 26%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 1 1 2
# of reports
2 1 3 1 1 8
ESG Score
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld
n/a rate (%)
53% 9% 41% 7% 7% 32%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
5% 5% 2% 1% 1% 3%
(B) standard
51% 51% 17% 0% 0% 23%
(C) self-reported
44% 44% 81% 0% 0% 41%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 99% 99% 34%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 1 1 2
# of reports
10 5 15 6 5 41
ESG Score
withheld withheld withheld withheld withheld secured
n/a rate (%)
16% 5% 14% 3% 3% 11%
Data Proofs
           
(A) external
8% 14% 2% 3% 3% 5%
(B) standard
29% 30% 20% 0% 0% 17%
(C) self-reported
63% 57% 78% 0% 0% 48%
(D) validated
0% 0% 0% 97% 97% 30%
# of verified reports
0 0 0 6 5 11
 
Comments & Disclaimers

1) The GBA proactively secured the overall product score. The level of granularity of data disclosure is subject to particular pilot decision
2) NA rate referes to the number of question the reporting entities marked as "not applicable" to their geography, jurisdiction, etc. In this wave of pilots the GBA only collects information regarding NA rate but does not check elizibility for exemptions and does not renormalize the calcultion, which mean that the score might be higher
3) PMA and HMA allocation principles are described in GBA GHG Rulebook
3) Data proofs refer to
    (A) external: reported documents’ coverage of the question audited via an external compliance audit
    (B) standard: reported documents’ coverage of the question audited via an external, 3rd party voluntary standard / scheme
    (C) self-reported: reported documents’ coverage of the question self-reported and not third party audited
    (D) validated: reported documents’ coverage of the question self-reported and third party audited